{"id":3564,"date":"2009-11-01T17:48:30","date_gmt":"2009-11-01T23:48:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/?p=3564"},"modified":"2014-07-14T18:57:55","modified_gmt":"2014-07-15T00:57:55","slug":"bookdue-process-and-international-terrorism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/bookdue-process-and-international-terrorism\/","title":{"rendered":"Book: Due Process and International Terrorism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Larry Pinkney&#8217;s landmark United Nations ruling victory (self-authored case) was cited in the book &#8216;Due Process and International Terrorism&#8217; by Roza Pati, published by Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (The Netherlands), 2009, Chapter II &#8211; Criminal Due Process Guarantees in Peacetime: The International Legal Regime, Section c. Due Process in Appeal, Pages 70-71:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[\u2026]<br \/>\nFor the right to appeal to be effectively available it is also needed that the courts give reasoned judgements in a timely fashion,<sup>237<\/sup> and that the transcripts of the trial be produced without undue delay.<sup>238<\/sup><br \/>\n[\u2026]<br \/>\n<sub>238 In the case of <em>Pinkney v. Canada,<\/em> the HRC found a violation of the provision on the grounds of a delay of 34 months for the author&#8217;s leave to appeal to be heard, because of delay in producing transcripts of the trial. <em>See<\/em> Communication No. R.7\/27, L. J. Pinkney v. Canada, Views adopted on 29 October 1981, U.N. GAOR, Doc. A\/37\/40, at 113, para. 35, read in conjunction with para. 10 at 103,.<\/sub><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"center\">\u2022\u2022\u2022<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/Larry%20Pinkney\/bio.htm\" frameborder=\"no\" scrolling=\"no\" width=\"640\" height=\"400px\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Larry Pinkney&#8217;s landmark United Nations ruling victory (self-authored case) was cited in the book &#8216;Due Process and International Terrorism&#8217; by Roza Pati, published by Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (The Netherlands), 2009, Chapter II &#8211; Criminal Due Process Guarantees in Peacetime: The International Legal Regime, Section c. Due Process in Appeal, Pages 70-71:<\/p>\n<p>[\u2026]<br \/> For the [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[28,45],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3564"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3564"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3564\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3570,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3564\/revisions\/3570"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.blackactivistwg.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}